Starfield physical release won't include physical disc - eviltoast

Phil doing what Don couldn’t

  • ShittyWizard@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No benefit? I only buy physical (when possible), because then the game is mine. You dont own digital only games, you just license them. I can give back, resell or lend my games and I get a feeling of ownership. I hate the direction the games industry is going.

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a physical box that contains a download code. There’s no game inside. No disc, no cartridge, nothing that actually holds the product.

      You’re not reselling that.

        • Kichae@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but understand the exchange you’re having:

          “Why sell a physical box if it contains no game? There’s no benefit to buying it!”

          “No benefit? Buying physical means I own it!”

          Does it not seem like you’re ignoring the actual issue being discussed?

          • Pigeon@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, they’re saying that what is being sold here is being falsely advertized as a physical copy of the game when it is not.

            “Why sell a physical box if it contains no game?” Is about this “physical edition” that isn’t.

            “Buying physical means I own it” is about actual physical editions that aren’t lies.

            • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’ve missed the point. The point was not that it was a fake physical box (we all get that), but rather why sell a fake physical box.

      • Kichae@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t. They clarify that owning a copy of the game does not confer copyright ownership, and they outline public performance rights, but it’s ownership over a physical object in the same way owning a lamp is, or perhaps more appropriately, the way in which owning a book is.

        If you say that you “own a copy of Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell,” no one crawls out of the work to argue IP and copyright law. Everyone understands what is meant.

        This is no different.