"We've won, but at what cost?" - eviltoast
    • a Kendrick fan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      people pay for a search engine, they would subscribe for a browser if it does what they want

      if Mozilla bundles a private, secure and well packaged browser with a good search engine and this browser performs well while still providing the current version for free, there’s a certain minority who would be compelled to pay for it

      atm, a browser and search engine is the major gateway to the internet, google has always done that at the cost of the user being a product, but it is now fucking that up and an alternative is needed, Mozilla could and should step in for that

    • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If a product requires constant maintaining and updates through out its lifetime (like a browser) then it’s make sense for a subscription model.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If a product is released in a defective or malfunctioning state, it makes sense to assign liability to the manufacturer.

        • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          if it’s a single player game or a mp3 converter software, then what you’re saying is true.

          But the internet is ever changing, new exploits and security vulnerabilities are discovered almost every day. New standards, new formats, new features released so often, even after the full release it still requires a full development team instead of just a few core maintenance staff.

          Unless you want to pay for every major version upgrade or risk using an outdated browser, a browser subscription model doesn’t sound so bad.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            the internet is ever changing

            We have standard protocols for communication that are system agnostic and simple to implement.

            Claiming you need a subscription to your browser to use the Internet is akin to claiming you need a subscription to your radio to listen to music.

            • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Radio gets revenue from advertisers, just like Firefox gets money from Google. If you cut off that revenue and move the cost to the consumer, then there’s no “one time payment” that could support a radio station indefinitely, so does Firefox.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Radio gets revenue from advertisers, just like Firefox gets money from Google.

                Private For-Profit Radio Stations get revenue from advertisement. But Sony and JBP and Bose aren’t advertisement based. Mozilla isn’t a content provider, its an application developer.

                there’s no “one time payment” that could support a radio station indefinitely

                There’s no “one time payment” that supports radio manufacturers indefinitely, either. So the companies develop new models and improved features, then retail them as replacements to the old device. But I’ve got an old machine from the 1980s that picks up AM/FM just fine. Sony isn’t out of business because it continues to exist.