Yevgeny Poddubny, the war correspondent on Russia's most popular TV station, state-run Rossiya 1, was killed by an FPV drone strike in the Kursk region. - eviltoast

https://t.me/c/1899284653/24171


There are new reports that he’s in the hospital. I will undelete this post if his death is confirmed.


https://t.me/astrapress/61420

Z-war correspondent Poddubny is alive, Kursk regional hospital reported

His hospitalization in the Kursk Regional Hospital was confirmed to the Defense Ministry’s Zvezda TV channel. Soon this information was confirmed by Poddubny’s employer, the VGTRK television and radio company. The Z-war correspondent was wounded as a result of a UAV attack.

The video allegedly shows Poddubny being hospitalized.

  • CptEnder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    He wasn’t wearing UN blue with PRESS patches, instead wearing Russian camo. That’s a big no no. Even non standard RA kit like black body armor is better. But you gotta wear white PRESS patches if you don’t want to be mistaken for a combatant. That being said, all embedded correspondents take the risk. No situation is ideal, but a technical with military markings is absolutely fair game.

    I agree no journalist should ever be targeted, regardless of their bias. Knowing Poddubny shouldn’t be targeted is why I know a NYT journalist won’t be targeted. They are in live combat zones though, and sadly people uninvolved do die in war.

    Source: work in doc/investigative journalism

    Here’s an example of what his kit should look like:

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Uhm, I just spent the last 15 minutes looking through Google image results for war correspondents in Iraq and Afghanistan d, but all I find is people wearing very distinguishable outfits from the servicemen in desert combat fatigues. A lot of the dark blue vests and helmets… even civilian clothes… so I’d like to tell you you are incorrect.