Can someone explain why so many people here are FOR blocking Threads.net on a server level? - eviltoast

I might not be understanding something about the fediverse, but isn’t this like if you couldn’t send or receive email from a friend because you use gmail Google decided to block @icloud domains?

Like, you’re not forced to follow or interact with it, and are free to block it if you can think of a reason to, I just don’t see why such an open platform used to limit users in this way

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sure, but that’s not the issue at all. The issue is that they’d be linking lemmy content from within Threads, as in using Lemmy content to drive engagement for Threads. Whether it’s used in an LLM is another matter entirely. Without direct API integration, Lemmy posts and comments won’t show up in Threads. That’s my take on why people want to defederate.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      so youre saying meta may use the information youre publicly posting as if it was public information?

      e. solution seems simple. require login to view content… or dont