Apple to Limit iPhone 15 USB-C Cables to USB 2.0 Speeds: Report - eviltoast

Apple to Limit iPhone 15 USB-C Cables to USB 2.0 Speeds: Report::undefined

  • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t really see the point? Like who’s going to be excited about faster USB transfer rates in 2026?

    • Thann@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The same people that get excised about the current generation of apple BS?

    • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple users get excited about things that Apple tells them to get excited about.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean who really cares 2023? Who used this port for data transfer later than 2015? I guess for proRAW it makes some sense. But even less with the airDrop later over internet in background. And proRAW even is a iPhone pro feature isn’t it.

      • CeeBee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just because you don’t care, doesn’t mean other people don’t care that their $2000 device is stuck at USB 2.0 speeds.

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol, the 2000$ iPhone will get thunderbolt iPhone 15 =/= iPhone 15 pro

        • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are you stuck with fax v34 speeds because your telecom hasn’t upgraded your landline to support the more modern v300 or are you fully covered by your internet equipment instead?