Kamala Harris smashes fundraising record with stunning $81 million haul over 24 hours - eviltoast

The highest 24-hour fundraising total, surpassing Trump’s post-conviction and (likely, given that they refuse to disclose it) post-assassination totals.

888,000 small donors, 500,000 of whom were first-time donors for this campaign cycle.

That’s the engagement and energy we should have been having this whole time. That’s the kind of engagement and energy that landslides Trump.

  • Onihikage@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Beats me on what do they spend those taxes

    It’s spent on what is by far the most powerful, expensive, and expansive military in the world, with funding about equivalent to the next ten militaries combined. All of Europe barely has any military spending by comparison; NATO is almost entirely propped up by the US military industrial complex. If US foreign policy wasn’t so doggedly imperialist, we might have room for some healthcare.

    That’s not even getting into how medical corporations in the US are more or less financially unrestrained and allowed to make as much money as they want, paired with an insurance industry with the same conditions, and both industries becoming more and more consolidated, with all the big players participating in the stock market. The result is a race to the top in which everything is made far more expensive than it needs to be in order to please shareholders. In this environment, spending government money on US healthcare is substantially less efficient than the same spending would be in a European country.

    Correction of these markets, as with housing, is likely to be financially devastating to the economic elite, but also critical to the prosperity of real people in this country.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      US military spending is lower than Poland’s… and yet Poland does have a universal healthcare system. Both countries are spending less than 4% GDP on their militaries.

      If US foreign policy wasn’t so doggedly imperialist

      medical corporations in the US

      a race to the top in which everything is made far more expensive than it needs to be in order to please shareholders

      I wonder if the same applies to US military corporations.

      So, less bang for the buck in all cases… except for “the shareholders”, after discounting all the C-level salaries and benefits, the creative bookkeeping, and non-dividend reserves… meaning only for the “big” shareholders, not the average Joes.

      Sounds like death by a thousand cuts million leeches.