Wildlife officials say SpaceX launch left behind significant damage - eviltoast

Wildlife officials say SpaceX launch left behind significant damage::undefined

  • wahming@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    This was obviously a mistake that cost them time and money, seeing as how their entire launch site was destroyed. Could they have been smarter? Perhaps. But given how many companies are actively malicious, I’m not too concerned at one that made an honest mistake.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Decades of rocket building says you need energy absorption systems and serious ones. Probably enough papers published on this topic to cover walls of my apartment.

      honest mistake

      • evilgiraffe666@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The article mentions deliberate decisions that caused more harm. But it was an “honest mistake” says the comments, so that’s ok.

        • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          How is it honest when they were informed by e Employees about the need to dampen the blast? It seems willful and reckless.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably enough papers published on this topic to cover walls of my apartment.

        I’d imagine it’s more like every apartment in the building.

      • Asuka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was a stupid failure of engineering, but focusing on the enviromnetalism aspect of the explosion is not particularly rational.