That gotta be one of the shittiest renderings of the Blood Devil that I’ve seen. And I’m not even talking about the 12 toes.
On-topic: I think that the impact of image-generating models will be smaller than the author predicts. Eventually people will desentivise to them, saying “ah, this is probably AI-generated”. Having someone generate a picture of you through an AI model will feel less and less disturbing.
Eventually people will desentivise to them, saying “ah, this is probably AI-generated”.
I suspect it’ll be more along the lines of “any image that challenges my world view is AI generated, but any image that confirms my biases is undoubtedly real.”
I mean realistic porn based on RL people. I predict that, in the future, if you see some potential nude of an acquaintance or relative you’ll immediately think “ah, this is likely AI-generated” and ignore it, without much of a thought. While now you’d probably think that it’s real, you know?
I predict that, in the future, if you see some potential nude of an acquaintance or relative you’ll immediately think “ah, this is likely AI-generated” and ignore it
Hopefully.
I think the bigger issue is how the subject/victim feels. If they see a compelling video of them doing something nasty, and the site tells them it’s been seen 7,536,865 times, are they going to shrug it off or feel weird? Now what if it shows them with someone they don’t like?
I hope it’s the former, but people get into their own heads. I suspect there will be a feeling of violation and discomfort that goes along with it.
Manual image manipulation has already existed for quite a while. Ten years ago you could also just dismiss anything that doesn’t confirm to your biases as photoshopped.
That gotta be one of the shittiest renderings of the Blood Devil that I’ve seen. And I’m not even talking about the 12 toes.
On-topic: I think that the impact of image-generating models will be smaller than the author predicts. Eventually people will desentivise to them, saying “ah, this is probably AI-generated”. Having someone generate a picture of you through an AI model will feel less and less disturbing.
I suspect it’ll be more along the lines of “any image that challenges my world view is AI generated, but any image that confirms my biases is undoubtedly real.”
This guy understands human nature.
That’s not a guy, that’s a bot
Nuh uh, I agree with him, so he’s a persom
I mean realistic porn based on RL people. I predict that, in the future, if you see some potential nude of an acquaintance or relative you’ll immediately think “ah, this is likely AI-generated” and ignore it, without much of a thought. While now you’d probably think that it’s real, you know?
Hopefully.
I think the bigger issue is how the subject/victim feels. If they see a compelling video of them doing something nasty, and the site tells them it’s been seen 7,536,865 times, are they going to shrug it off or feel weird? Now what if it shows them with someone they don’t like?
I hope it’s the former, but people get into their own heads. I suspect there will be a feeling of violation and discomfort that goes along with it.
I hope so, too, but sadly only time will tell.
Manual image manipulation has already existed for quite a while. Ten years ago you could also just dismiss anything that doesn’t confirm to your biases as photoshopped.
Yeah. Face swapping is so easy it makes fake nudes absolutely trivial to create even by an amateur.
https://www.photopea.com/tuts/swap-faces-online/