You google it if you like. You won't find it. - eviltoast
  • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    An untestable hypothesis is not science. Science is ideas and hypothesis that have undergone the scientific method. Until then it’s just a thought experiment.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. If it’s not testable, it’s not science.

      I was watching some dumb video where a Christian “scientist” was trying to “prove” that god was the best scientific explanation because it could not be wrong. Which is exactly why explaining things with god isn’t science.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          Ελληνικά
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depends on what you mean by “The Big bang”. If you’re talking about a seemingly spontaneous explosion of matter ~14 bya, then no, that’s not science. That’s like saying that the sun, or dirt, or a hurricane is science. Forming a hypothesis that all matter can be traced back to a single expansive event, then observing movement of celestial bodies, measuring those movements with redshift and seeing if that data is in-line with your hypothesis… That’s science.