"Privacy-Preserving" Attribution: Mozilla Disappoints Us Yet Again - eviltoast
  • doodledup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Mozilla is not a non-profit. And if they were, they are legally bound to it. It’s not optional to go by the mission if you’re a non-profit.

      • doodledup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yes, as I said. Mozilla is not a non-profit. Mozilla Foundation is a non-profit. But that was not mentioned. There is a clear distinction.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          The Mozilla term is used to be ambiguous, I think deliberately so. So they get ZERO sympathy from critical readers when they do some BS under the auspice of “no, that wasn’t the non-profit side”. You have one reputation, you live and die by your behavior.

          The Corporation / Foundation split is great for accounting and corporate structure, sure, but its not a shield against criticism of their behavior not matching their stated missions.