NASA and SpaceX misjudged the risks from reentering space junk - eviltoast
  • EfficientEffigy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    For the geriatrics like me: Glamping means glamorous camping.

    So, nice and expensive tents with all the luxury in a wilderness environment.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    It seems like they need to put a motor in the dragon trunk to perform a deorbit burn after it’s detached.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    On all of these occasions, engineers expected none of the disposable hardware would survive the scorching heat of reentry and make it to Earth’s surface.

    More stuff is getting launched into space than ever before, and the trend will continue as companies deploy more satellite constellations and field heavier rockets.

    “The biggest immediate need now is just to do some more work to really understand this whole process and to be in a position to be ready to accommodate new materials, new operational approaches as they happen more quickly,” said Marlon Sorge, executive director of Aerospace’s Center for Orbital and Reentry Debris Studies.

    Ideally, a satellite or rocket body at the end of its life could be guided to a controlled reentry into the atmosphere over a remote part of the ocean.

    But this is often cost-prohibitive because it would require carrying extra fuel for the de-orbit maneuvers, and in many cases, a spacecraft doesn’t have any rocket thrusters at all.

    In May, a 90-pound chunk of a SpaceX Dragon spacecraft that departed the International Space Station fell on the property of a “glamping” resort in North Carolina.


    The original article contains 402 words, the summary contains 188 words. Saved 53%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!