Driverless cars worse at detecting children and darker-skinned pedestrians say scientists - eviltoast

Driverless cars worse at detecting children and darker-skinned pedestrians say scientists::Researchers call for tighter regulations following major age and race-based discrepancies in AI autonomous systems.

  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That works in a city, it’s not viable to have mass transit in every place, you still need cars for total areas

    • zephyreks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those areas don’t really have silly things like pedestrains, though. They’re also far too small of a market to design self-driving cars for.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are areas that are not rural that need cars, because the public transit sucks.

        There’s no fast way to go to San Jose where my friend lives from Sunnyvale where I’m staying.

        Walking is 3 hours, but walking to a train stop and then walking from the train stop would be about 2 hours. Buses don’t connect well either, so it’s still like 2 hours after you do all the transfers.

        Or I could pay $17 for a Lyft and make it there in 20 minutes.

        Yes, public transit should be better in the suburbs, but you’re talking about a very large SF bay area that needs better connections from everywhere to everywhere

        • zephyreks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The SF Bay area needs more funding for transportation, period. The roads seem to always be under construction and the traffic lights just spontaneously stop working sometimes.