Five Men Convicted of Operating Massive, Illegal Streaming Service That Allegedly Had More Content Than Netflix, Hulu, Vudu and Prime Video Combined - eviltoast
  • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think there’s room for improvement on copyright laws, but that’s a far cry from the outrageous claim that intellectual property isn’t a real thing.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Infringement of IP is a crime according to specific states, but if you make art, and I replicate it, it doesn’t affect you.

      If you write a story and I read it without paying you, it doesn’t affect you.

      The only reason IP is a thing is because short-term monopolies on media (or inventions or methods) were enshrined by specific states as law, and then spread through trade agreements, and they were expanded on without concern for their original purpose or for the good of the public. In fact, we’re seeing fair use rights fade since states aren’t willing to enforce them, and platforms like YouTube over censor.

      So at this point, in the US, the EU and the eastern market, no IP law would be better than what we have.

      So no, you have not demonstrated any reason I should have respect for your IP.

      However, if you’re going to insist, and be an IP maximalist, there is one thing I can do for you /to you (or Sony, or Time Warner, or Disney) that is worse than pirating your product.

      And that, of course, is not pirating your product.

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You are thinking about IP with tunnel vision. You just want to gain entertainment for free. There’s more than that to IP laws. How would you like it if you made art that was then used in a manner that you philosophically disagree with. For example, Meghan Trainor had a song that was used against her will in a political campaign against same sex marriage, she was able to cease and desist this use because of IP laws.