Twitter seems to ban all Threads links to reaffirm its position as a “free speech absolutist” platform - eviltoast

A search for Threads content on Twitter currently brings up zero results, despite plenty of links to Meta’s microblogging rival being posted on the platform.

  • SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s done everyone a few favors. He showed us that the government sticks it’s fingers into social media in ways that are illegal, and he also showed us that corpos aren’t a good alternative because they’ll stick their fingers into social media in ways that are legal.

    Decentralization and self-hosting is ultimately the only protection against forces that want to force us to see what they want us to see and nothing else.

    • baru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      He showed us that the government sticks it’s fingers into social media in ways that are illegal

      That’s what a few right wing media repeatedly claim but I haven’t seen anyone actually providing any proof. Or do you mean the recent crazy judge decision?

      • SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact that there’s censorship is self-evident. It’s highly documented that in the past 3 years social media companies have cracked down on specific political speech. They banned a sitting president, and are continuing to ban speech from political candidates from both US political parties.

        So was this caused by the government? Well, we do know that there’s the twitter files, but maybe you go “hey, he’s a far right electric car guy, don’t believe him” – I know what happened to me.

        I donated to a protest I agreed in. The company returned my money.

        Hey, ok. Maybe it was just that this specific company didn’t agree with the protest. The protest moved to another company that agreed with the protest. The money was prevented from reaching the cause by the government.

        People started looking at new ways to help, and the government threatened to sieze our bank accounts.

        This is highly documented, was a public event. So we at least circumstantially know that western governments directly engaged in censorship.

        Eventually you end up with a preponderance of the evidence.

        Hey, you disagree with my political speech and think I deserve to be censored by the government? Great. Fine. Just remember that tomorrow it might be you who has something unpopular to say.

      • joel_feila@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        well with the government they just gives them selves the power sick their fingers in and make it legal

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      He showed us that the government makes requests and Twitter doesn’t care because they don’t have to. So what?