Cops Released a Car’s Travel History to a Total Stranger - eviltoast
  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I highly doubt the government knows where I go:

    • older car with no smart crap
    • red light and speed cameras are illegal in my state
    • I use an alternative Android ROM on my phone with a firewall

    That said, I totality agree with your assessment. We need better pedestrian, cycling, and mass transit infrastructure. The problem is that pretty much nobody campaigns on that. Rs campaign on fiscal issues, Ds campaign on “culture” issues, and neither deliver on their promises anyway. I want more trains and more pedestrian/cycling infra, but neither party seems to care…

    • randombullet@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      But do you sanitize and vet your carrier data?

      Triangulation using cellphone towers is not unheard of and they can subpoena it.

      Then again, a national state actor going against a private entity is rare and the private entity will often lose.

      Same thing with my home cameras, I use unifi because it’s easy and the data is stored locally. That way the police can’t subpoena Amazon or any of the big companies for their cloud data.

      I’m being very facetious. Privacy is a losing battle. You fuckup once, you negate a lot of hard work.

      -Sent on my stock Google Pixel lmfao

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, I forgot about triangulation. But I highly doubt my government is routinely gathering triangulation data on citizens, and especially not generally law abiding citizens like me. I suppose I could use a faraday cage to guarantee no tracking, but that’s well in the “tin foil hat” category of paranoia.

        I use GrapheneOS and disable location most of the time, and sensor access is disabled for most apps. My firewall only allows a handful of apps to access mobile data, and I disable mobile data entirely fairly frequently. I only use Google Play for a handful of services, and they’re in a separate profile so they get fully closed when I’m done with them.

        The government could subpoena information about me, but I doubt they routinely collect the sort if information that my phone exposes.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          If you where targeted by a state actor there is not much you could do honestly. They have more resources, more knowledge and more time then any one person. The truth is almost everybody is not going to be targeted.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Exactly. I’m not being targeted by a state level actor, I don’t have any warrants or anything, and I’m pretty boring overall.

            There are two main strategies to staying hidden:

            • don’t be seen
            • blend in

            I do the first for the big threats (social media and other big tech), and the second for everything else. If the government wanted to find me, they could, my goal isn’t to hide, but to give them no reason to look for me.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes, those are legal, but pretty much limited to law enforcement and paid parking lots. Since police can’t issue citations based on video evidence alone, they’re not nearly as common here as elsewhere. Private businesses could probably grab that from security cameras (e.g. gas stations), but that should, in most cases, require a subpoena.

        I rarely go places where license plate readers are common, so those data points are pretty few and far between. If I was running from the law, I’d certainly act differently, but the police have no reason to request a subpoena, so I’m unlikely to be tracked.

        It is possible though, and I really don’t like that. But it’s just not likely.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago
      • red light and speed cameras are illegal in my state

      This doesn’t ban license plate reader cameras. My state also bans red light and speed cameras, but automatic license plate readers are 100% legal. I have seen the ALPL systems firsthand, and know they’re in use. You wouldn’t even notice them, because they’re mounted on traffic lights and power lines. It’s not like red light cameras, where they have a blatantly obvious giant camera box.

      My local municipality 100% uses ALPLs, and has referenced them in a number of arrests recently. They’re mostly used for Amber Alert situations, where police already have a description of what to look for. In these cases, the ALPL will basically allow them to track the car in real time, without even needing to follow the car. Because they simply get updates every time the car passes an intersection, so they can set up a stop ahead of where the person is traveling.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Here’s the state code (Utah) on license plate readers:

        Law Enforcement use of the ALPR systems is limited by 41-6a-2003 to:

        (a) Apprehend an individual with an outstanding warrant;
        (b) Locate a missing or endangered person;
        © To enforce motor carrier laws, or
        (d) To locate a stolen vehicle, or
        (e) As part of an active criminal investigation.
        (f) Troopers will not run ALPR data prior to, or during a traffic stop unless reasonable suspicion can be articulated for an active criminal investigation.
        (g) Any time ALPR data is used, written documentation and a case number must be completed

        It’s very possible the police have scanned my license plate, and imo that’s totally fine, provided my car is in public and one of the above apply.

        From those:

        1. I have no warrants, so this doesn’t apply
        2. Could happen to anyone, but chances are very low
        3. I’m obviously not a commercial vehicle
        4. Possible, but unlikely. I drive old, crappy cars, so my car is unlikely to be similar to a stolen car.
        5. Again, possible, but I don’t commit crimes worth tracking via license plate. Any crimes I do commit would likely fall under traffic violations.
        6. I try very hard to not give police reasonable, articulable suspicion. If stopped, I give short answers and have yet to have a problem.
        7. Police are lazy, so they’re unlikely to use ALPR data unless they have a good reason. I intend to never give them that good reason.

        I go after the low-hanging fruit so as to not arouse suspicion and protect me if there is suspicion. Going any further (e.g. trying to fool ALPR systems) goes against that. If I’m on public roads, I assume my car can be tracked, so I drive carefully and keep my car properly maintained. I also store any potential contraband out of view so as to not raise suspicion if I am stopped.

        It would be nice to go even further, but I’m not going to break the law to try to hide, I’m going to blend in instead.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Still have triangulation from cell towers and probably others still even with the firewall. Do you have Gapps installed?

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I have Gapps in a separate profile, which I almost never use. So 99% of the time, it’s not running.

        And yeah, the government could find me if they had a warrant. I’m not running from the police, I’m trying to give them no reason to need to look for me. I’m more concerned about big tech tracking me and giving the government a reason to watch me, so that’s what I’m looking to avoid.

        If I wanted to hide from governments, I would take a very different strategy.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes. The police could find me if they had a warrant, but they don’t and I’m not going to give them a reason to get one. My state doesn’t allow automatic use of license plate scanning equipment without reasonable suspicion, and police have to submit a report if they use it.

        So I’m not worried about it. I’m not running from the police and acting like I am could give them reasonable suspicion, and that’s counter-productive.