Valve faces a £656 million lawsuit in the UK for 'overcharging 14 million PC gamers' - eviltoast
  • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    By your logic they shouldn’t be broken because it’s the competitors’ fault if people don’t do business with them instead.

    Yes exactly, that’s why they shouldn’t be broken.

    They’re consumer friendly and are not taking specific action to BE a monopoly, contrary to many other companies.

    There’s also enough competition and it’s exactly their fault that they fail/refuse to implement what makes Steam so popular.

    I’m definitely against monopolies, but mindlessly slapping rules on them just because they’re labeled monopolies is some of the dumbest shit I’ve heard

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You cannot base your decision on if the monopoly seems friendly to you or not, what kind of Mickey mouse logic is that? Fucking hell.

      You’re going to wait until it’s problematic to do something about it? Man, I hope you show more logic in how you managed things in your personal life!

      “I’m definitely against monopolies”

      No, you’re not, you’re against the monopolies you don’t like, there’s a major difference.