IBM selling The Weather Channel and the rest of its weather business - eviltoast

IBM selling The Weather Channel and the rest of its weather business::IBM will sell The Weather Company to Francisco Partners, a tech-focused private equity firm, for an undisclosed sum, it announced Tuesday.

  • ABeeinSpace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    IBM will still sell you a brand new, updated mainframe in 2023.

    They’re also in the open source software space (IBM owns Red Hat, a software company that has a lot of projects for Linux. Red Hat has their own Linux distro too)

    • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which threats users to had their subscription cancelled when they share the source code according to GPL.

      • ABeeinSpace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. I agree with ya there, Red Hat screwed over Alma and Rocky with that decision. I can see the utility of those two distros for testing before committing to RHEL.

        Plus, if Oracle has room to try to be the “good guys”, you’ve really screwed up

        • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nobody was “testing” rhel by using Rocky or Alma, they just didn’t want to pay for it. I mean you can test actual rhel for free!

          • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah. Deploy Rocky or Alma in mass. Have RHEL for a few machines. When you got a problem, reproduce it in RHEL and call support.

            • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That sounds pretty exploitative to me, and exactly the kind of use case that red hat wouldn’t want to support.

              Think about what “bug for bug compatibility” actually means, they’re promising not to make any fixes or contribute to the build in any way!