Roses are red, violets are blue, everyone is using IPv6, why aren't you? - eviltoast
  • hddsx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Roses are red, violets are blue, everyone is using IPv6, why aren’t you?

    Roses are red, violets are blue, IPv6 costs extra, and that just won’t do

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      In the USA they charge extra for IPv6? I’m in the UK and while there are some ISPs that don’t provide IPv6 at all, and some that do shitty things like dynamic prefixes on IPv6, I’ve not seen anyone charging for it.

      Likewise, server providers generally don’t charge for it. In fact, they will often charge less if you don’t need IPv4.

      • mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        No don’t take shitposts literally. I’ve been using ipv6 for a decade at home now in the USA and I don’t pay extra for it ever. Also why are you assuming this post refers to the us?

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          There’s been other posts about IPv6 and the TL;DR is that while there are shitty implementations everywhere, the USA seems to be ahead of the game of doing it badly, if at all.

          • mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The USA is ahead of most nations at about 50% so not sure how you’re coming to that conclusion based off of evidence. Outside of maybe Brazil in the americas on both continents our ipv6 adoption is better than the rest, Canada included.

            • orangeboats@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I reckon I see most IPv6 complainers are from the US though…

              In my country, turning on IPv6 is not really something ceremonial, it’s just literally clicking on the IPv6 checkbox. The default configurations set in the router are good enough for an average home user, firewalls and all that security jazz are enabled by default.

              The DNS didn’t break just because I enabled IPv6, nor did my phone apps stop working. Life goes on, and I have gotten rid of that terrible CGNAT. Somehow this is not the case for many US users across multiple ISPs, I have heard IPv6 horror stories from Verizon, Comcast, and AT&T. Like how did you manage to do that?

              • mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I mean I’ve been using native dual stack for over a decade and I’m most definitely American. A fun anecdote was I was having issues with clicking on links from Google once and turned out ipv4 was busted but 6 worked fine for half a day. And there really isn’t any turning on ipv6 I get it by default and it’s with the most hated isp Comcast. They’re actually really good about v6 support I’ve not moved off them because of it. It’s literally 10ms faster than 4 lilely due to cgnat.

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Meanwhile me who needs to pay 97 EUR / year for two V4 to V6 proxies so people not having (or disabling, ugh) V6 can connect to my stuff.

      Actually those proxies are still cheaper than renting v4 address space for all my servers.