Why is End of Life of an OS bad for an average user? - eviltoast

I get that there won’t be any security updates. So any problem found can be exploited. But how high is the chance for problems for an average user if you say, only browse some safe websites? If you have a pc you don’t really care much about, without any personal information? It feels like the danger is more theoretical than what will actually happen.

Or… are there any examples of people (not corpos) getting wrecked in the past by an eol OS?

  • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I am not using apple products myself any more, but 7 years of guaranteed support seems very reasonable, especially when our dumb ass economy runs on constant consumption and growth. They could just as easily make their devices break a week after the legally required warranty period is over, and you’d have to buy another

    • aasatru@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not reasonable, but it is understandable. This is why FOSS is the only viable alternative for sustainable computing.

    • FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Seeming reasonable in the context of the madness of constant growth is still not reasonable. I get what you mean, but we need to demand better of the ultra powerful if we want to see better in our lifetime.

    • Lung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      No but you see, there’s no reason a newer osx can’t run on their older hardware most of the time. You can install new windows on an old laptop if it has the specs. It’s not like they lost the drivers or whatever. It’s a choice they made, cutting off users from security updates & newer apps & leaving them with a vulnerable device