OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series - eviltoast

OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series::A new research paper laid out ways in which AI developers should try and avoid showing LLMs have been trained on copyrighted material.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 年前

      First, we don’t have to make AI.

      Second, it’s not about it being unable to learn, it’s about the fact that they aren’t paying the people who are teaching it.

        • FatCrab@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 年前

          The reasoning that claims training a generative model is infringing IP would still mean a robot going into a library with a card it has to optically read all the books there to create the same generative model would still be infringing IP.

        • AncientMariner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 年前

          Humans can judge information make decisions on it and adapt it. AI mostly just looks at what is statistically what is most likely based on training data. If 1 piece of data exists, it will copy, not paraphrase. Example was from I think copilot where it just printed out the code and comments from an old game verbatim. I think Quake2. It isn’t intelligence, it is statistical copying.

          • uis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 年前

            Well, mathematics cannot be copyrighted. In most countries at least.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 年前

          because it might hurt authors and musicians and artists and other creative workers

          FTFY. Corporations shouldn’t be making a fucking dime from any of these works without fairly paying the creators.