There is a drop in monthly active Lemmy users (from 65k to 57k) - eviltoast

It is probably due to a number of people stopping using their alts after some instance hopping.

Also a few people who came to see how it was, and weren’t attracted enough to become regular visitors.

Curious to see at which number we’ll stabilize.

Next peak will probably happen after either major features release (e.g. exhaustive mod tools allowing reluctant communities to move from Reddit) or the next Reddit fuck up (e.g. removing old.reddit)

Stats on each server: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/list

  • Lucia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Side note: OP did originally have the phrase “And that’s good for lemmy” (or something very similar to that) in the title of this post, but they’ve since edited it. I don’t know of a way of recovering what the original title said to be certain but it’s worth knowing this, as that’s a lot of the context behind this thread around why people (like myself) are decrying those that are saying it’s a good thing.

        • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I did edit it, because I was getting too much negativity on the “good thing” part of the title.

          I did not even intended as bait, I meant it as “it’s a good thing that the community will stop thinking that everything is fine and actually reflect about how to fix it”. That was my first comment with the post, but it got buried into the rest of the reactions.

          Later threads like https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/2243096 and https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/2241408 seem to show that some people are indeed becoming aware of the issues.

            • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, that’s what I wanted to avoid by having a positive spin, but I got so much negative feedback that I changed it.

              That’s life, I guess

      • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I did edit it, because I was getting too much negativity on the “good thing” part of the title.

        I did not even intended as bait, I meant it as “it’s a good thing that the community will stop thinking that everything is fine and actually reflect about how to fix it”. That was my first comment with the post, but it got buried into the rest of the reactions.

        Later threads like https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/2243096 and https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/2241408 seem to show that some people are indeed becoming aware of the issues.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      growth hasn’t stopped, it was just overtaken by the drop in Lemmy users

      Can you explain to me how this isn’t a complete contradiction? How has growth not stopped while users have? That doesn’t make any sense to me. Are we saying there’s user growth or not?

      That’s why I pointed out on the fact user growth never stopped - Lemmy’s still attracting new users, just people who weren’t interested in lemmy in the first place decided to leave.

      I’m trying to understand your viewpoint here, but I’m just not getting it. Overall users are in decline, that’s not good. Sure, I have no doubt that we’re still attracting new users but we’re still losing users as well - more than we’re attracting. We’re at a net loss of users and that’s not good.

        • Kushan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You said Lemmy can’t attract new users at this point

          Can you please point out / quote where I said this?