Does the form factor between 3.5" and 2.5" matter in a NAS server? - eviltoast

Been finding some good deals on 2.5 disks lately, but have never bought one before. Have a couple of 3.5 disks on the other hand in my Unraid server. Wondering how much it matters wether I get a 2.5 or not? What form factor do you prefer/usually go for?

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      SMR is a relatively new disk format technology that makes drives cheaper but writes slower, which can be noticeably bad in a NAS, especially if you are using a write-intensive RAID type. Most disk manufacturers will have drives meant for NAS like WD Red or Seagate Ironwolf, and they are almost all CMR and not SMR.

      • ultimitchow@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        i have had SMR drives slow to about 2MB/s with sustained sequential writes. “noticeably bad” really undersells how terrible they are.

      • Stowaway@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        WD reds I believe are smr, wd red pros are cmr, or at least that was a thing for a while that WD did silently.

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Indeed, it’s worth explicitly checking every drive you buy if you are using it in a NAS.

    • HMitsuha@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Shingled Magnetic Recording

      Basically the write head writes over part of the magnetic track below the current track, reducing the physical size of each data and increasing how much data can be stored on one side of a disk.They’re bad for random writes because the drive would need to rewrite data in the track below it as well.