"Maybe This is Too Cool" - After years of layoffs and pay/resource freezes, Amazon execs treat themselves to a private Foo Fighters concert worth millions - eviltoast
    • Phegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      We have to all work together to give those consequences. Workers need to act as a united force to push back against the ruling class. Checking out hurt the movement. Help us show them the consequences.

      • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        History has a way of repeating itself. Best we can hope for is a soft reset. It will always be this way until human avarice is somehow ejected from our genome.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        Most of the people in those concerts are employed. They’ll have stock with Amazon, as does everyone working for Amazon on a full time, permanent contract.

        You do realise Amazon is a public company, don’t you? If your country allows fractional shares, you could become an owner of Amazon for £10.

        Is the “ruling class” anyone who has a report at Amazon?

        • VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/6039327

          " if you’re under retirement age and quit your job tomorrow, do you have enough assets to comfortably live out the rest of your life"

          This gets to it. Basically bourgeoisie is the owning class and proletariat is the class that can only survive via labor, but as the post says it’s a bit more complicated these days. You could have a business owner or landlord who gets the same amount of paycheck as say a high-paid tech person, or actor, or doctor, or something. And the former is petty bourgeois and the latter is not, because the former owns assets and the latter, if they lose their job, will before long need to find another one in order to survive.

          Now you could have someone getting a wage that’s been high enough for a long enough time that they have been able to acquire assets that could bring in income, which changes things somewhat. But the main thing to analyze is the relationship to resources, land, and means of production.

    • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh well see that would actually require communication and commitment.

      We don’t do that. Something about needing that job that they definitely won’t pull out from under us to pay those bills that never go up.