"For you" isn't - The case against corporate algorithmic feeds - eviltoast
  • JustinHanagan@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The essay is not about suggesting a dichotomy. The article is about how corporations sort their content feeds based on maximizing profitability, and the subsequent consequences that result for the end user (humans) in the form of endless distractions.

    • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s the story for Lemmy then? With no corporate interests behind the scenes, what metrics is Lemmy using to sort?

      • JustinHanagan@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Lemmy devs actually publish their goals/methods for “hot” and “active” sorting here. You may find it of value!

        The important difference, imo, is that Fediverse users have final say over the sorting of their own feeds. Reddit/Twitter/etc prioritize engagement, not actual value added to the user.