Content Warnings Do Not Reduce Distress, Study Shows - eviltoast

Advocates for the use of trigger warnings suggest that they can help people avoid or emotionally prepare for encountering content related to a past trauma. But trigger warnings may not fulfill either of these functions, according to an analysis published in Clinical Psychological Science.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21677026231186625

  • hollyberries@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    From my experience, CW only works if the post is completely hidden from the feed without the option to view it.

    Blahaj Zone had the option to yeet that shit from the timeline entirely and it worked amazingly until a migration fucked that up leaving it broken for months and my mental health dropped off a cliff because holy fuck did I not realise most of the people I followed posted so much depressing shit that triggered my cptsd. The urge to click the button was too strong.

    Its par for the Fediverse course, really. Good ideas and half-assed implementations.

    • Rimu@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m sorry to hear that.

      Some Lemmy apps have keyword filters that may help?

      • hollyberries@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Definitely! Voyager has been wonderful when it comes to filtering and my filter/block list is massive. I do have the issue where the Lemmy timelines get stale quickly and All is a ghost town but its worth it to see mostly positive things. The desktop experience is atrocious.

        On the microblog side, moving to an instance running Sharkey was the best thing to do as Sharkey has the feature to hide the CWs entirely.