Why FOSS projects are using proprietary, privacy invasive infrastructure? - eviltoast

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/15691030

As you can easily notice, today many open source projects are using some services, that are… sus.

For example, Github is the most popular place to store your project code and we all know, who owns it. And not to forget that sketchy AI training on every line of your code. Don’t we have alternatives? Oh, yes we have. Gitlab, Codeberg, Notabug, etc. You can even host your own Gitea or Forgejo instance if you want.

Also, Crowdin is very popular in terms of software (and docs) translation. Even Privacy Guides and The New Oil use Crowdin, even though we have FLOSS Weblate, that you can easily self-host or use public instances.

So, my question is: if you are building a FLOSS / privacy related project, why using proprietary and privacy invasive tools?

  • Tobias Hunger@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I never said that you can not run a project elsewhere, my point is that you will get way more interaction on github.

    Try pushing your project to github and compare the interactions you get from both forges.

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      We took it from github, there’s not much difference. Just had to SEO better to get the new repo above the old one