Seedless Catholics Against Watermelons? - eviltoast
  • The_v@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    A. They have no significant difference in nutrition than non-GMO. In fact many GMO’s have been created to improve nutrition but sadly not used because of dumbfucks like Greenpeace who would rather have people go blind or die than accept GMO food. For example, rice that produces vitamin A and folic acid have been created but never used.

    B. The “Terminator” GMO gene was created by the USDA-ARS and was NEVER released. No seed on the market has ever had a GMO sterility gene. Contrary to public opinion, it was designed to be integrated with other GMO genes to prevent the outcrossing and spread into the environment, not as an IP control mechanism.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Also don’t forget the elite side of the food industry (gourmet chefs, etc.), that needs to demonize the more cost-effective things in order to make their own alternatives look more appealing.

      Speaking of it, one anti-GMO organization actually shown expensive gourmet food as an allternative to the golden rice.