Funny, those guys don't usually agree on that much - eviltoast

Do any of them know what the word “liberal” actually means?

  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Definitionally, it cannot. Capitalism is individual ownership, Socialism is collective ownership. By definition, workers in Capitalism have no real say.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Capitalism is individual ownership, That’s the key! It gives you all the rights and freedoms to create your own business and lead it the way YOU see fit. By definition, Capitalism doesn’t have workers or other classes, everyone is equal. Socialism is an authoritarian ideology, which puts the needs of a social construct (a virtual entity, if you prefer) over the needs, rights and freedoms of an individual. One must be very delusional to support authoritarian socialist ideas in any way, shape or form.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Individual rights to become a Capital Owner and exploit the majority of society is by definition class society. In Socialism, there are no classes, because ownership is shared. There are no Capitalists exploiting workers.

        You don’t know enough about Socialism or Capitalism to discuss either.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          No, you don’t know enough if you think that equal freedoms and rights lead to “exploitation” and “classes” while inherently authoritarian ideology means there are no classes. Like, lol, what kind of lunacy is that?