Flatpak integration is still not great - eviltoast

Its even worse when you force Firefox to use wayland its icon doesn’t even show.

Edit: Oh since everyone now is confused; I only have the flatpak version of Firefox installed yet it doesn’t use the pinned icon and doesn’t even use the firefox icon under wayland at all.

  • darcy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    the only reason to use flatpaks is if your system doesnt come with a good package manager and repositories (pacman+aur, nix, etc), and dont want to build from source.

    snaps, on the other hand, should be avoided at all costs imo.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or if the repos contain outdated versions of the software. And yes, snaps are cancer, still cannot avoid them. 🥲

    • ASK_ME_ABOUT_LOOM@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Could you elaborate on snaps? I’ve used them here and there and people seem to have really strong opinions on snap that I just don’t understand.

      • Rooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tied to proprieatry backend, snap store looks like ass and runs like one, spawns loop devices that mess up the /mnt folder, tied to fake .deb packages that install snaps instead. Basically, a lot of proprieatry nonsense that St. Ignucius frowns upon.