Is there a such thing as indirect federation? - eviltoast

I’ll explain with an example - there are 3 Lemmy instances A, B, C

A federates with B but not C

B Federates with both A and C

Does A indirectly get the content from C due to B’s federation with it?

edit: Formatting for clarity

  • Izzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m going to guess not because then we would have infinite loops of federated content. It probably checks the source instance before syncing content.

    • WontonSoup@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That makes sense if it were to become circular. The way I was thinking of it is like

      B gets C’s content making C’s part of B’s. so because C’s is a part of B then A gets it.

      But I guess C’s content isn’t really B’s its only there through federation? Trying to wrap my head around all this, appreciate the reply.

  • Myrhial@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I have understood it correctly then A should only get content from B because they are directly linked. Content from C will display on B (via ‘all’) but will not be sent over from C. Else A would never be able to block C.

  • zumi@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just also want to add:

    When A federates with B, it does not get B’s content. A only gets content from B that A’s users subscribe to.