Harm Reduction Rule - eviltoast

There are no ethical choices under first-past-the-post voting. We must instead make a decision that reduces the most harm.

  • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    You do not speak for me. I am social democrat. We need the market economy of capitalism. We just don’t need share holders or private business owners.

      • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Social democracy. Trying to tell me what I believe with an arbitrary system of rigid definitions is both ineffective and easily refuted argument.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m aware of what you believe, I am also aware of what the systems that describe your beliefs are referred to by everyone else.

          I am not telling you what you believe, but what the label is.

          • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I recommend a descriptive approach to definitions as opposed to a prescriptive approach. I think that would resolve a lot of the discourse we are having. I have explained what I mean in my argument. Your argument centers on this false idea that definitions can limit what a person thinks and believes. But definitions are only as useful as they help us communicate.