Harm Reduction Rule - eviltoast

There are no ethical choices under first-past-the-post voting. We must instead make a decision that reduces the most harm.

  • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is certainly a defensible position, yes. I’m just not so sure we’re going to avoid the christo-fascist dictatorship with the Democrats. They forever capitulate to our christo-fascist party, and they themselves are authoritarian at heart. Just look at the White House and its support for genocide, border fascism, subjugation of protestors, defending of an inequitable hierarchical economic system that relies on forced labor, and those are just the first examples that come to mind

    • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think the Democrats are not a great political party. I’m registered independent. They are the only mainstream political party for pursuing progressive change that we have at the moment. We have to take our chances with the Democrats because it’s the clearest path to a better future that we have.

      We do need to adopt socialist policies as a country in addition to that though. If we stick with neoliberalism then we are going to keep having this problem. The fascist movement will inevitably grow as the wealth disparity gets worse in the US. People are going to be looking for solutions to their problems, but neoliberalism inherently denies them the tools to fix the systemic issues they face. Neoliberals cling to civility politics and value property over justice for people to name a few. Fascism will provide them with easy, but incorrect, solutions in the form of out-groups to hate. The answer to our problems is socialism, but we need time to convince people.

      I know it’s a long shot, because people are effectively conditioned from living in a neoliberal society to reject socialism without any evidence. But we have to try. The only way this gets better is convincing people that socialist ideas have merit while neoliberal and fascist ideas do not. People’s lives depend on nations developing and maintaining inclusive political and economic institutions. We are going to need to have this ideological reckoning at some point, so we might as well have it sooner rather than later.

      Trying and then failing presents the same consequences as not trying. So we might as well do it now.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        This sounds like you want to implement social changes within the existing system. This is the lie of progressives and radlibs. It will never work. We need to dissolve the United States of America. There is nothing here worth salvaging, save the people.

        • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          This sounds like you want to implement social changes within the existing system. This is the lie of progressives and radlibs. It will never work.

          No, I want to radically change the system. Doing that of course involves using the system. We need to move from liberal democracy to social democracy. And our democracy must be fixed to have majority rule. It can work, but nothing is guaranteed. This is no different than how a revolution can succeed, but has no guaranteed outcome. As long as we have a democracy we might as well use it.

          We need to dissolve the United States of America. There is nothing here worth salvaging, save the people.

          Dissolving the US will result in the death of hundreds of millions of people. People have to eat. When societies collapse, their populations tank with them, because the people lose the state centralization they are dependent on to get basic necessities.

          There is no saving the people without inclusive political and economic institutions. If we value people then we must fix the systems they depend on to live.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            from liberal democracy to social democracy

            Social democracy is a farce. That’s exactly what I mean. It’s a fairy tale told by progressives and radlibs

            Dissolving the US will result in the death of hundreds of millions of people. People have to eat. When societies collapse, their populations tank with them, because the people lose the state centralization they are dependent on to get basic necessities

            Sounds like you desperately need to read some theory. This is some liberal shit

            Edit: I see in your comment history you calling yourself a “progressive.” You’re lying now and saying leftist. I think you’re completely untrustworthy.

            • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              Social democracy is a farce. That’s exactly what I mean. It’s a fairy tale told by progressives and radlibs

              It’s a political ideology with a set of ideas and policies. Social democracies have existed in Nordic countries for decades. How they have done is debatable, but they do exist.

              Sounds like you desperately need to read some theory. This is some liberal shit

              I recommend Why Nations Fail. It’s been really good so far, but I’m still only half way through. So far, they seem to have missed that capitalism is inherently extractive and thus always at odds with an inclusive political institution like democracy. Private corporations are inherently incentivized by profit margins to undermine democracy. To remove regulations, oversight, taxes, etc. This is the contradiction of liberal democracy that social democracy solves. By adopting socialism, so the workers own the companies they work for, workers are included in both the nation’s political and economic intuitions. Since only the worker class exists, there is no one being incentivized to undermine the people’s institutions.

              I hope neoliberals like Biden starts saying stuff like that, that would be awesome.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Social Democracy isn’t Socialism, it’s Capitalism with safety nets. Workers do not own the Means of Production in Nordic Countries.

                I believe reading Leftist theory would do a lot for you.

                • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Social Democracy isn’t Socialism, it’s Capitalism with safety nets.

                  It is is a form of socialism. The fact it has a market economy does not mean it is capitalism.

                  Workers do not own the Means of Production in Nordic Countries.

                  I didn’t say they did. Like most countries they have a mixed economy. No one has yet abandoned capitalism entirely. The fact they haven’t adopted every socialist position does not mean they aren’t socialist. I am saying social democracies need to adopt that policy. Workers owning corporations as apposed to share holders is not incompatible with social democracy, but a logical inclusion.

                  I believe reading Leftist theory would do a lot for you.

                  You know this stuff isn’t just theory right? It has practical applications in real life too.

                  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Social Democracy is not Market Socialism. Social Democracy is Capitalism with expansive social safety nets, not Worker Ownership of the Means of Production. This is fundamental. Again, Social Democracy is not a transitional state towards Socialism nor Socialism itself, but welfare Capitalism.

                    Leftist theory does in fact have practical applications. Being confidently incorrect as you have been is impractical, hence the importance of theory.

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                This book and the things you’re describing here may be left of, say, typical neoliberalism in that it entertains some thoughts about the perpetual threat of revolution, but ultimately it is yet another propaganda piece published in a desperate attempt to maintain the chains of capitalist society. Of course, some leftist theories don’t even seek change through revolution, opting instead for more of a community-style approach, which is why you see groups like the Zaptistas. No leftist theory of which I’m aware seeks change (at least, not the bulk of its change) through the existing system. This would be absurd in that it is true that there will always be inequities inherent to capitalism. Take the most socially democratic state in the world, and they’re still relying on wage inequities, forced labor, and worse.

                Here are some personal suggestions, as a starting point:

                https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/carlo-cafiero-karl-marx-s-capital

                https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-the-conquest-of-bread

                https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-gelderloos-anarchy-works

                https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-mutual-aid-a-factor-of-evolution

                There are four I’d personally recommend.

                There are non-monetized youtube channels with free audiobook versions of all of these books, if you prefer audio.

                • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I appreciate the recommendations.

                  No leftist theory of which I’m aware seeks change (at least, not the bulk of its change) through the existing system. This would be absurd in that it is true that there will always be inequities inherent to capitalism. Take the most socially democratic state in the world, and they’re still relying on wage inequities, forced labor, and worse.

                  Theory is great, but we have to apply the theory to our real lives as best we can. As I said, how effective existing social democracies have been is debatable, but they are a working model of some, but not all, of the ideas and policies. Grassroot movements seek to radically change the system using the system. That’s the modern progressive experiment. The only way to find out if it works is to do it. Like anything else I believe success is possible, but not guaranteed.

                  • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    “working” model in that they’re working as intended-- by churning profits out of an inherently inequitable system.

                    Sounds like you might be a neoliberal tbh

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I do get a lot of liberal anger sent right to my inbox

        Sure wish they’d direct some of that rage toward the people who are killing us and our planet, but I suppose I’m an easier target lol