It’s Time To Retire The Super-Earth, The Most Unsupported Idea In Exoplanets [2021] - eviltoast
  • mister_monster@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    So we can deduce that the density and volume of the gas envelope is a function of the mass of the planet, the temperature of the star and the distance of the planet’s orbit. This would mean, generally, that rocky planets are most common closer to the star than gas giants, and so the configuration we see here is not uncommon. This would also mean an earth sized planet occupying an orbit a little farther out would be bigger with a larger gas envelope, and that in our orbit the planet would be bigger and have one.

    • btaf45@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is an interesting observation. This means that dwarf stars, which are much more common than a star like the sun, are very unlikely to have a rocky planet with the same size and orbit of Earth. But a giant star like Betelgeuse might have a rocky planet much bigger than Earth. Although a full orbit of Betelgeuse would take a long time.