TIL 40 states in the US charge you $20-$80 a day for being incarcerated in prison. - eviltoast

Very weird that I am so old and have literally never heard this mentioned in a TV show or book or movie or anything.

In four out of five states, if you go to prison, you are literally paying for the time you spend there.

As you can guess, this results in crippling debt as soon as you’re released.

The county gets back a fraction of what they hold over your head the rest of your life until you commit suicide(or die naturally and peacefully with the sword of damocles hanging over your head).

$20-$80 a day according to Rutgers.

Counties apparently sue people and employ wage garnishment to get back the money that majority of people obviously cannot pay back.

https://www.rutgers.edu/news/states-unfairly-burdening-incarcerated-people-pay-stay-fees

  • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Remember, though, that people, opinions, and political landscapes can change. Yes, Biden was pretty shit back in the 90s, but it actually feels a little bit like he’s trying to move back in the other direction. Don’t gotta forget the bad, but also can’t forget the (attempts at) good

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Right it’s important to remember 94 was literally 30 years ago. Attitudes can change significantly in that time.

    • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, he wants to be known as a good guy. Look at GW Bush. They all want to be known as good guys late in life. Gates, Buffet, et al.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      6 months ago

      Remember, though, that people, opinions, and political landscapes can change.

      Yeah, but Biden hasn’t.

      Remember when he mocked ‘Defund the Police’ in his first state of the union address?

      He’s an authoritarian. Always has been, and he’s been a reliable vote in favor of every regressive piece of legislation that’s led the country to this point, where fascism is becoming normalized.

      • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        Oh, please. If he was an authoritarian, he would behave like Trump or any other authoritarian ruler out there.

        Remember when Trump was president? He would kick reporters out of the white house, or tear gas people in front of the white house for a photo op. He said stuff like “I totally won’t do this,” then the very following day, he would do that. His speech was divisive. Should I go on?

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          34
          ·
          6 months ago

          Just because Trump was more personally belligerent doesn’t change the fact that Biden is an authoritarian.

          • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            6 months ago

            You just spotted my flawed argument. True. Biden is not authoritarian, though.

            Tell me how is Biden authoritarian, Russian Agent #4557?

                • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  17
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Right, because you’re insecure about the fact that you can’t rebut my replies.

                  The problem with that is we all have to suffer for the insistence of you and yours to elect these people.

                  • keyez@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Funny the left feels the EXACT same way, report to your handlers/Putin your job was done for today and some fresh air would be a good idea.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        People change as the issues become more apparent, when Obama was elected he said he “Respected the LGBT Community” but firmly believed “Marriage is between a man and a woman”

        This same president gave us Gay Marriage in all 50 states

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        He’s had some policies I agree with, that move us towards a less police state level. I admit, I haven’t followed him super closely, he’s less interesting than things have been lately, but at least the federal decriminalization of marijuana and pardons (I know they were effectively useless, didn’t really do anything - we can get into exactly why) show he’s at least trying to do what constituents want, which is a far cry more than a lot of other politicians.

        Can he, should he, do more? Yeah. But credit where it’s due, he seems like he’s trying to steer two giant ships - his own past biases, and the United States political climate. Both of those are slow and hard to do, so anything moving in that direction should be celebrated.

        • havokdj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          6 months ago

          Don’t be fooled, Joe doesn’t give a shit about decriminalizing any substance, after all, he wqs the biggest proponent of the RAVE act

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            See, this is EXACTLY my point. We all get obsessed over the things of the past, and while those can help inform us of the present, they’re not actually the present.

            Yes, he was a proponent of the RAVE act. That’s one of those “don’t forget the bads” that I mentioned. We can accept that, and also accept that he seems to have lightened up on that BS in recent times.

            No one’s perfect, everyone changes their minds about things. You did horrible things in your past too, almost certainly. That’s not you, we can accept that, but for politicians it’s this unchanging thing - you supported one thing, you will always continue supporting that thing.

            Let people grow. Let ideas be brought up, and shot down. Let mistakes be in the past, and start focusing on what’s actually happening in the present.

            • havokdj@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              It’s not about “being obsessed with the past” it’s about paying attention to history, particularly a certain person’s history. Joe biden had not been even remotely interested in legalization/decriminalization until he started running for office. Joe Biden was already an old man when he pushed for enforcement of the RAVE act along with other drug bills, I can maybe understand his “concrete jungle” statements from the 70’s, but we are literally talking about barely over 20 years ago.

              All I am saying is to be cautious and not too trusting, ESPECIALLY of politicians.

              • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Right. As I said, you can use the past to color your present, but the thing that matters presently is present actions and, to a lesser extent, words. So, judging him based on his actions during presidency, which should show us either his current beliefs or, at least, his willingness to listen to constituents.

                During his presidency, he’s been… Well, I won’t say stellar, but his actions have been more in line with someone who actually wants better, rather than someone who wants to cling to old habits. Again, could he do more, yes. But his record -recently- has been, for a politician, pretty good.

                You bring up the RAVE act. That was 20 years ago. 20 of the most eventful years in at least modern history. Do you think someone is incapable of change for 20 years? I know I’ve changed drastically just in the last 2 or 3 years. I mean, yeah, he’s old, but I’ve seen old people change too. Might not come full revolution, change is slow, but again - any progress is worth acknowledging and celebrating.

                Is there something he’s done during his presidency that leads you to believe he’s still got those same values from prior? We can talk efficacy of some of his planned solutions, and some of his lack of a spine, but I think overall his actions are consistent with his words, in this regard.

                • havokdj@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I agree with you for the most part, but at the end of the day, you have to take someone in power action by action. Everyone who has ever held office has pretty much done at least one or two good things for their community. I’m not saying that I’m totally anti Joe Biden, but I think that he (like all politicians) can be full of shit sometimes. Remember back when he got elected, he proceeded to undo everything trump did about border control and even made that a big part of his campaign? As of late, he has slowly been reimplementing those policies. I think Biden is someone who rides off emotion and public feedback in relation to followers of his party, which can be a good thing but it can also be a bad thing.

      • Aolley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        When in most of our lifetimes has the u.s. presidental election not been ‘the lesser of two evils’?

      • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Liberals hate the fact they openly support a right wing segregationist authoritarian