What We Risk by Normalizing Poilievre’s Politics - eviltoast

Just days before the 2006 election Stephen Harper made an extraordinary statement. Seeking to assure Canadians a potential Conservative majority government would be restrained from accruing “absolute power,” Harper submitted that his party would face “limits” because of “checks,” naming specifically courts, civil servants and the Senate.

His words would prove prescient. The majority government Harper’s party eventually formed in 2011 was held accountable by various democratic actors and lost 15 significant court cases, mostly for violations of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The assurance was justified.

Current Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is offering no such assurance. In fact, he is doing the opposite; just this week Poilievre offered encouragement to protesters promoting extreme positions on the purpose of government.

This raises the stakes of the next election as Poilievre’s politics represent a radical departure from the norms of Canadian decency, decorum and democracy.

  • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Being far more lenient on those with similar ideologies (ex. it’s understandable that churches are burned down, all the pro-Hamas protests)

    Do you put your own pants on, or does someone do it for you?

    • pipsqueak1984@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Considering that we have protesters literally calling for genocide (“from the river to the sea”) which way above and beyond what happened with the truckers… Yes, the government is playing favourites.