TechCodex@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoWould you agree?programming.devimagemessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1663arrow-down1147
arrow-up1516arrow-down1imageWould you agree?programming.devTechCodex@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square109fedilink
minus-squarehellishharlot@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 year agoMaking money is a capitalist adjacent idea. The premise that we need money to figure out how to allocate resources is foolish
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoI’m still waiting for someone to propose in detail an alternative.
minus-squareargv_minus_one@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoYeah, that’s the problem. We don’t have the requisite technology to build a Star Trek utopia. If only we did…
minus-squarevrkr@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 year ago The premise that we need money to figure out how to allocate resources is foolish Money not necessarily, we need to calculate costs (and minimize it) in distributed fashion.
minus-squareBatmanAoD@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoAnd the only reasonably successful way we’ve found so far for doing so is…money.
Making money is a capitalist adjacent idea. The premise that we need money to figure out how to allocate resources is foolish
I’m still waiting for someone to propose in detail an alternative.
Yeah, that’s the problem. We don’t have the requisite technology to build a Star Trek utopia. If only we did…
Well, if everything ran Linux…
Money not necessarily, we need to calculate costs (and minimize it) in distributed fashion.
And the only reasonably successful way we’ve found so far for doing so is…money.