Mercedes becomes the first automaker to sell autonomous cars in the U.S. that don't come with a requirement that drivers watch the road - eviltoast
  • cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    As of April 11, there were 65 Mercedes autonomous vehicles available for sale in California, Fortune has learned through an open records request submitted to the state’s DMV. One of those has since been sold, which marks the first sale of an autonomous Mercedes in California, according to the DMV. Mercedes would not confirm sales numbers. Select Mercedes dealerships in Nevada are also offering the cars with the new technology, known as “level 3” autonomous driving.

    Drivers can activate Mercedes’s technology, called Drive Pilot, when certain conditions are met, including in heavy traffic jams, during the daytime, on spec ific California and Nevada freeways, and when the car is traveling less than 40 mph. Drivers can focus on other activities until the vehicle alerts them to resume control. The technology does not work on roads that haven’t been pre-approved by Mercedes, including on freeways in other states.

    U.S. customers can buy a yearly subscription of Drive Pilot in 2024 EQS sedans and S-Class car models for $2,500.

    Mercedes is also working on developing level 4 capabilities. The automaker’s chief technology officer Markus Schäfer expects that level 4 autonomous technology will be available to consumers by 2030, Automotive News reported.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Hmm, so only on a very small number of predetermined routes, and at very slow speeds for those roads.

      Still impressive, but not as impressive as the headline makes out.

        • Cryan24@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Chances are, If you can afford the car, then that amount is nothing to you.

          • ours@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            7 months ago

            Having known one, some of their customers love their feature loaded cars to brag about and feel extra special. Some will definitely pay the 2.5k gladly.

        • Veraxus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          If they assume full liability for any collisions while the feature is active (and it looks like they do), then I can see that being fair.

        • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Come on, you have been able to pay the price of that Mercedes in the first place.

          These 2500 are not going to hurt.

      • Turun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes, but it’s actually level 3.

        Not the Tesla “full self driving - no wait we actually lied to you, you need to be alert at all times” bullshit.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve seen this headline a few times and the details are laughably bad. The only reason this can be getting any press is because the headline is good clickbait. But 40 mph top speed on approved roads in 2 states only if a car is in front of you in the daytime is entirely useless. I guess it’s a good first step maybe? But trying to write headlines like this is big news is sad.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        7 months ago

        40 mph top speed on approved roads in 2 states only if a car is in front of you in the daytime is entirely useless.

        It’s specifically designed to navigate traffic congestion, which happens under 30 mph. It can keep up with the lane, deal with lane changes, honk if someone backs into you, let ambulances through, things like that. Not sure why the article presents it as generic driving.

      • Turun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        The reason this gets attention is because it’s the first level 3 sold to consumers.

        The tech is hard, of course it’s gonna start out with laughingly limited capabilities. But it’s the first step towards more automation.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It’s starting in California where there are a meaningful number of high earners who are spending hours per day in 4 lane bumper to bumper traffic.

        Having actual autonomy during those hours is still shit. But it’s a hell of a lot less shit than the tedium of the high attention requirements of sitting in traffic at a crawl.