God forbid we try to make the game anything but a cakewalk - eviltoast
  • shani66@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Gotta ask which mage you playing. Ascension feels really good imo, the health being the same for basically all mortals means combat, when it has to happen, is fast and lethal, with whoever had the foresight and prep time coming out on top. Not to mention things are not meant to be fully balanced, things are meant to be as strong as they are not to be punching bags for players.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I was playing Mage: The Awakening 2nd edition. I really like it but it’s not super popular, so finding players is hard.

      It sounds like it has the same way of modeling health. Adults have 5 + stamina health boxes. So your average person is 7, the strongest mortal in the world is 10. You have a pretty good idea that if you do nail that guy with a rifle shot, he’s not getting up.

      DND especially was frustrating to me when it was like “ok a veteran soldier… Does he have 10 HP? 20? 50? One attack? Two?”. There’s like no way to reliably reason from the narrative to the rules.

      • shani66@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Awakening is essentially a different version of Ascension, so you’ve got the basic Idea of how it plays, although i think it’s a bit more lethal and straight combat is more discouraged.

        Playing a point buy system with character creation that is the same between NPCs and PCs really does let you have a better connection to the world. You can reasonably guess or study it logic out things about other people in the world.