I’m curious to learn about places around the globe that have a significant amount of underutilized tourism infrastructure. In many cases, I suspect that governments are propping up unsustainable tourism operators or investing in tourism with a “build it and they will come” mentality.
Here are a few examples that I’m aware of:
-
Qatar - The country has an oversupply of hotels relative to the number of visitors, and its tourism economy heavily relies on layover tours due to the strength of Qatar Airways’ network.
-
Saudi Arabia - In an effort to diversify its economy away from oil, the country is pushing a massive tourism development agenda, despite having many factors that make it less appealing to visitors. Religious tourism seems to be a primary focus.
-
North Korea - For obvious reasons… For example, only a few floors of the Ryugyong Hotel are ever occupied.
-
Northern Japan (Aomori, Akita, Sendai) - These places are heavily fueled by domestic tourism, and are basically deserted for half of the year (despite attractions and so on still functioning).
-
EDIT: Maybe the Caribbean islands outside of Cruise ship season?
To clarify, I’m not looking for hidden gems or places that are simply underrated travel destinations. Instead, I’m interested in learning about locations where there is a clear mismatch between the available tourism infrastructure and the actual number of visitors.
I want to find places where I might end up being the only visitor to a museum or one of few tourists on an airport bus. The fact that these museums and airport limo buses even exist is where the question stems from.
Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina spent $21.5 million back in 2005 building the Randy Parton Theater that was supposed to be the anchor of a new entertainment/shopping/tourism destination. Roanoke Rapids is the first town in North Carolina as you drive south on I-95, kind of hitting a halfway point for people driving to Florida from New York/New England. Randy Parton is Dolly Parton’s brother. The idea was people would stop for the night, get dinner, see the show, maybe do some shopping, and leave the next day. I remember a quote from a local politician saying tourists were great: they come, they spend money, and then they leave. You don’t have to build schools for their kids or have any other large expenses. That was the theory and plan anyway.
Nothing else was built besides the theater; I don’t think they even built a new hotel. Attendance was actually a sellout at first, but after 2 years was averaging under 100. Tourists never really came in and with no other acts besides Parton’s the locals had no need to keep returning. The theater’s still there and I think used occasionally but it’s a burden on the local tax base as they’re still paying off the bond, without all the tourist revenue that was supposed to pay for it.
Here’s an article I found with a quick search: https://www.carolinajournal.com/randy-parton-theatre-still-haunts-roanoke-rapids/
There are a lot more articles out there and there was video from when Parton was fired; I think someone tipped off the news because there were reporters and cameras waiting and Parton appeared intoxicated. Just a big mess all around.