Discord is nuking Nintendo Switch emulator devs and their entire servers - eviltoast

And perhaps sidestepping its own policy in the process.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well, the next best option would be paying for hosting in a 3rd world country who doesn’t give a shit about international copyright laws. Not an easy task, but hosting your own Discord like platform is probably the absolute best you can do if you’re running an operation like making an emulator while the copyright bandits cry foul.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sure, hosting your own platform or using a decentralized solution would prevent this bullshit, but the whole situation is worse than just them deleting it. The whole issue is that no Discord terms of service were violated here. So they went against their own terms with this move, which means anyone is subject to the same actions even if they are complying with the terms of service.

      • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        The whole issue is that no Discord terms of service were violated here.

        Really? I’m not a lawyer, but…

        TOS:

        We reserve the right to block, remove, and/or permanently delete your content if it is in breach of these terms, our Community Guidelines, our other policies, or any applicable law or regulation, or if it creates risk for Discord or negatively impacts the experience or interests of other Discord users to continue to make it available.

        Community guidelines:

        24. Do not share content that violates anyone’s intellectual property or other rights. This includes sharing or selling game cheats or hacks. (See our Unauthorized Copyright Access Policy for more.)

        For more information on how Discord handles copyright complaints, please view our Copyright & Intellectual Property Policy.

        Given that there’s a court order stating these tools violated Nintendo’s intellectual property rights, not sure how you can draw the conclusion that this is somehow not a violation of the TOS

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          They didn’t share the content in Discord. It’s a huge distinction.

          If we were to interpret this the way it was applied in this case, pretty much all servers would have to be removed. You shared an image you don’t own the copyright to, server nuked. You shared the video you don’t own the copyright to, server nuked. You shared the link to some tool that allows you to download a video you down have a copyright to, server nuked.

          And there isn’t a court order “stating these tools violated Nintendo’s intellectual property rights” since the case was settled outside of court.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            The only one I can see that could be applied to the situation is “risk for discord” if Nintendo threatened them with a lawsuit.

            • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Under which grounds? For a threat to work, it has to have some merits.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                They could threaten to sue discord for hosting copyrighted content, even if they expect to lose it doesn’t matter, the goal is to make discord close the channel and it worked.

                Cost/benefit analysis, you’ll probably win the lawsuit, it will still cost you a shit load of money in the meantime and you’re fighting against a company that has enough money to stop all its activities for a decade and still come out with enough funds to resume activities as if nothing happened. Or you can just ban one community from your platform.

                • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Right, if they host it, but they don’t. That’s the difference between what happened with GitHub/GitLab.

                  And they can’t sue without the case having any merits. Meritless lawsuits also legally known as frivolous lawsuits are thrown out before even discovery phase with attorney fees awarded and the moron lawyers getting sanctioned.

                  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Hosting isn’t necessary, providing access is enough, otherwise The Pirate Bay wouldn’t have had to change location again and again.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        So they went against their own terms with this move, which means anyone is subject to the same actions even if they are complying with the terms of service.

        Sure, but if you were comfortable with Discord as a home for this work, people have been speaking up against discord as a resource for these kinds of things pretty much since the beginning of discord.

        Its a lesson learned, but better off now that later. No corporation can be trusted. You have that knowledge now if you didn’t before. Make decisions accordingly.

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          People were not comfortable about it until 2021 when they relaxed their terms of service. Heck, Discord even approved them as community servers that have stricter rules.

          It’s a clear move that they are done with Discord being a chat platform and ready for their IPO.