Is it more respectful to use more current photos of people who have died? Or is it better to use photos from their "prime"? - eviltoast

Just had this thought and I’m caught between the two. Assuming anything being considered were all “good” photos, what would you prefer if it were you?

*Lots of great responses! I do want to clarify that I am not currently dealing with this scenario myself, but I appreciate the thoughtful comments. Hopefully they can help people that are struggling. I know I’ll keep them in mind for the future.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    A tombstone should last for centuries, but a QR code depends on a URL that might not last 5 years.

    Either the QR code should be on a swappable card, or needs to point at a domain controlled by the family like RememberingJoeSmith.com

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      How long do you think Joe Smith’s family is going to maintain that site, given that it costs real money?

      Related: How long after death until people stop visiting the grave?

      (Yes, there’s a joke about the dead visiting graves, but I chose to ignore it)