Is rsync.net a good service for backups? - eviltoast

I’ve been playing around with the self hosted apps for quite a while and I got to the point where I’m happy about my local setup. Next step is to setup reliable offsite backup. I’m using borgbackup as a tool to manage my backups (so far only local backups). I’ve been looking for an affordable yet reliable service to store my backups. Is rsync.net worth it? According to the “internet” it’s a good service but wanted to double check. What do you think about it?

    • 🌘 Umbra Temporis 🌒
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      If you ask me, I say Hetzner is a seriously underrated provider. I love using their services. Cheap as chips too.

    • @merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      Seeing all the hetzner mentions made me finally look into it and

      1. yep, they seem to be cheaper than alternatives without getting into shady territory and

      2. pretty easy to set up! I finally have an offsite backup of my home server and it only took me like an hour to do

  • Juergen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    103 months ago

    I have been using it for a few months, and it is working well. By default, you get daily snapshots, with a retention of 7 days; I believe you can buy more.

    rsync.net is no-frills remote storage that gets out of the way of whatever you want to do. In my case, this is rsync over ssh, but they also support borg.

  • @verstra@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’ve opened up the pricing page, and it seems it is much more expensive then their mainstream competitor Backblaze. For a terabyte of backup for a month, rsync.net would charge 1024*0.012 = 12$, while Backblaze would charge 6$. Hetzner Storage Box would be only 3.20$ (+better price scaling over terabytes).

    What am I missing?

    Sources:

      • @Deckweiss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Sorry, I am a bit dense.

        What do you mean exactly? As far as I understand you access the data the same way you have put it in - by using either one of ftp, scp, rsync or borg data transfer protocolls.

        • lemmyvore
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          Some storage services will tax data separately on its way out, or limit the amount you can get out, or limit the speed at which you can get it out etc. Always check for egress conditions in the fine print.

    • @redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Note that rsync.net includes free 7 days daily snapshot. Also, the main advantage over backblaze b2 for me is you can just sync a whole folder full of small files instead of compressing them into an archive first prior to uploading to a b2 bucket. This means you can access individual files later without the need to download the whole archive.

      I still use b2 to store long term backup archives though.

      • Tywele
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        Hetzner also supports snapshots and you can upload files uncompressed.

        • @redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I haven’t actually tried it though so I’m not sure how it compares with rsync.net. How easy it is to access snapshots on hetzner? On rsync.net, snapshots are stored under .zfs folder so it’s very easy to access.

          • @Mora@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            You turn the visibility in the web interface on and then you can browse them as well.

          • Tywele
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            I don’t know from the top of my head and I can’t check right now.

  • BoofStroke
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I use it. No complaints here. They’ve recently reduced their rates. The alternatives are more involved and more expensive. I put my remote Borg repos on rsync.net

    Because I use Borg I don’t really need their zfs snapshots but those are pretty cool too.

    I have multiple Borg repos, so rather than add a remote for each I just rclone everything at once to rsync.

  • @johntash
    link
    English
    23 months ago

    I like rsync.net. They offer reduced pricing for using restic/borg too.

    I’m not sure how many years I’ve used them, but I never had any issues. The speeds also seem better than at least b2.