Nintendo submit Yuzu DMCA request to Internet Archive - eviltoast
    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      7 months ago

      Github probably didn’t receive a cease and desist yet, but I doubt they’ll put up a fight against Nintendo.

      • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I highly suggest starting to familiarize ourselves with federated git repos. I‘m testing forgejo atm hoping to be able to host it publicly at some point. That way, once something is out there, its pretty much everywhere.

          • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah, I get that. But I dont think that its possible to really dmca every fork of a repo on 20 countries without running out of resources at some point because when one fork is taken down, people will make 10 more. the important part is discoverability imo. Feel free to educate me in case this is missing a point.

            • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              7 months ago

              its easy enough to send angry shit to every server, dmca and whatever rights violations they can think up, and it can become an issue.

              Of course, the Federation is great, but you still need an instance that’s in one of those privacy-oriented countries.

          • kaputter Aimbot@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 months ago

            – A wild Codeberg appeared. –

            Codeberg is a collaboration platform providing Git hosting and services for free and open source software, content and projects.

            Website: Codeberg.org


            The organization selected the European Union for their headquarters and computer infrastructure, due to members’ concerns that a software project repository hosted in the United States could be removed if a malicious actor made bad faith copyright claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

            Wikipedia: Codeberg e.V.


            In June 2022 the Software Freedom Conservancy’s “Give Up Github” campaign (in response to the GitHub Copilot licensing controversy) promoted Codeberg as an alternative to GitHub.

            Conservancy: Give Up GitHub!

            • Atemu@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Certainly better than the U.S. in that regard but I wouldn’t consider Germany “resilient” either.

            • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Unfortunately using codeberg itself is kinda crap. Its not the worst thing in the world, but it still has zero discoverability , and is missing features like code search.

              it does have potential though if it is resilient.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            The DMCA only applies in the US. Every other country doesn’t give a shit about your DMCA request.

        • eratic@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 months ago

          Federated git repos doesn’t mean that the source code will be replicated across instances. It just means you can do things like create tickets and pull requests across instances.

          • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not sure I understand. I should be able to fork a public repo across instances, no? Why bother otherwise?

            • Slotos@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              7 months ago

              Federation has nothing to do with that capability. git clone exists since the beginning of git.

              • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                hmmmm… I see your point. Maybe I wasnt explaining my point clear enough. Right now, I cant see someones fork of some software if I’m on some gitlab which is not federated afaik. I should have said discoverability I guess. Does that make more sense?

                • r00ty@kbin.life
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I mean, not saying anyone should, because evading copyright is bad. But technically, you could run say forgejo as an onion service. Connecting git to clone from it would take some extra steps but, if hidden well it’d make it somewhat harder to take down.

                  • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Evading oppressive mechanics is always a great idea imho but I digress.

                    I’m not really talking about making it unable to be taken down, which is already what happens when you put it in a non public repo. I’m talking about exhausting the corpo and damaging their image for going after people using software to play their bought games on their pc. It could kick off a trend of peeps shaming corpos (especially nintendo) for going after legit players who want control of their devices and property. (whoever feels like pointing out that “technically you just own a license”, just dont).

          • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            When I create a fork (in the web UI) does my instance not git clone from the source instance? Not going around cloning random federated repos I can see, but…