Court Bans Use of 'AI-Enhanced' Video Evidence Because That's Not How AI Works - eviltoast

A judge in Washington state has blocked video evidence that’s been “AI-enhanced” from being submitted in a triple murder trial. And that’s a good thing, given the fact that too many people seem to think applying an AI filter can give them access to secret visual data.

  • Natanael@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    But if you don’t do that then the ML engine doesn’t have the introspective capability to realize it failed to recreate an image

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      And if you take your eyes off of their sockets you can no longer see. That’s a meaningless statement.

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        The point is that the AI ‘enhanced’ photos have nice clear details that are randomly produced, and thus should not be relied on. Are you suggesting that we can work around that problem by choosing a random seed manually? Do you think that solves the problem?