I just rewatched Discovery. Does anyone else think this jump in the timeline is too jarring? - eviltoast
  • Jaccident@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    That’s a half-myth it seems. There was a write in campaign from the fans to rename the then tentatively named Constitution (in recognition of the 200th anniversary of the ratification of the US Declaration of Independence), to Enterprise. At the same time, Gerald Ford had the final say, and he himself served aboard the famous WW2 aircraft carrier, the USS Enterprise (CV-6). It would appear that there is a confluence of two wishes to lead to the test vehicle being finally officially named the Enterprise. Certainly of recent years, NASA has seemed happy to not dispel that story though.

    Some interesting tid-bits here though. The NCC-1701 was early on going to be named the USS Yorktown. Yorktown-class was the ship class of the CV-6 Enterprise. While we all know that the ship class of the NCC-1701 was the Constitution-class.

    So, it’s my belief therefore that, in our timeline and Star Trek’s timeline, American men of a certain age seem to be obsessed with the symbolism of three particular names; and no matter what, the Shuttle would have been Enterprise in both.

    • invertedspear@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      ROFL, upvote cause the good info on Enterprise, but OP said Discovery. My head was stuck on Enterprise for some reason. Probably so many comments with the theme song to Enterprise.

      We really do go from the age of sailing to the shuttle with the Discovery name

      • Jaccident@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I couldn’t tell if there was some joke I wasn’t getting, but the “naming paradox” comes up a lot (and I too believed it for years) so I thought I’d add some colour anyway.