Chris Langan and the "Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe"? Oh boy! - eviltoast
  • blakestacey@awful.systemsOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    And here’s Ben Goertzel, formerly MIRI’s director of research:

    I find myself mentally comparing Langan to Eliezer Yudkowsky, another high-IQ maverick who has personally avoided the academic establishment, while developing his own deep and idiosyncratic view of the universe. Both Langan and Yudkowsky have the habit of introducing a lot of novel vocabulary for describing their ideas, though they have different styles of doing so (Langan likes inventing new words; Yudkowsky prefers assigning new meanings to commonplace phrases, e.g. “Friendly AI” or any of the zillion other “defined terms” commonplace on the Less Wrong blog/network he founded). […] Langan’s style is very clear and elegant, in some places beautiful, but doesn’t do the reader any favors — you really have to read each sentence and absorb it fully before going on to the next.

    zoom and enhance

    Langan’s style is very clear and elegant

    Typical Langan, for reference:

    In the CTMU, the self-inclusion process is known as conspansion and occurs at the distributed, Lorentz-invariant conspansion rate c, a time-space conversion factor already familiar as the speed of light in vacuo (conspansion consists of two alternative phases accounting for the wave and particle properties of matter and affording a logical explanation for accelerating cosmic expansion).

    Goertzel is also co-editor of a book called Evidence for Psi — he’s a Cosmist who believes in psychic powers.

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      at the distributed, Lorentz-invariant conspansion rate c, a time-space conversion factor already familiar as the speed of light in vacuo

      You just said “at the speed of light”, but while doing a backflip and taking a shit mid-air.

    • sinedpick@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      as a wannabe science/mathtist I totally feel the pain of realizing that I will probably never have any good, original ideas unless I actually dedicate my life to studying the works of people that actually had good, original ideas.

      In these people, I see a version of me that didn’t tell myself that all my stupid theories of the universe and consciousness are total unfalsifiable wastes of time. It’s a type of “high-iq” psychosis.