That's why we need two ssds for dual boot - eviltoast
  • mholiv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 months ago

    With UEFI it’s waaayyyy less bad than it used to be. There is no more MBR in the traditional sense for windows to clobber. Windows and Linux can share an UEFI boot partition both dropping in their appropriate boot binaries.

    Even if you install Linux and Windows on separate devices, unless you do something strange they will share the same UEFI boot partition.

    • bulwark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      Personally, I do 2 separate UEFI boot partitions. Grub is the default which can select the windows boot partition. Then Windows can do whatever it wants to it’s own boot partition.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Man, when I first messed around with Linux I hosed the MBR more times than I can remember. Either through Windows smashing it with an update, or my dumb ass doing stupid shit in gparted.

      Pretty sure I was able to recover the important files somehow, but my parents banished me to the old family desktop for that pretty quick.

    • muhyb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      By something strange, I assume you mean installing Windows on a disk with the other disks disconnected so Windows will create its EFI partition on that disk (since it’s dumb and will create EFI partition on the first disk it finds, even if it’s an HDD). Though UEFI doesn’t mind, will still list all the bootloaders from different disks without any problems. You can even unplug and plug them as you wish, it still won’t be corrupted this way.