Teacher who resigned after her OnlyFans page was discovered says new employer fired her for violating social media policy - eviltoast

Had to supplement her $42,000 per year teacher salary with OF and made nearly $1 million in six months (almost 50 times as her salary) before the school caught wind of it and forced her to resign. Got a new job out of education and was fired five days later when they discovered news articles about her.

Edit: To those basically saying she had it coming because she made her OF account public…

  1. Sex work is real, valid work.
  2. There is nothing wrong with sex work. Sex-shaming is Puritanical horseshit.
  3. “But her students could find her OF!” is a problem their parents should have to solve. It is not her responsibility to use an alias, because of points 1 and 2.
  4. Every other argument criticizing her for her sex work during her non-teaching hours is fucking moot.
  • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Ok so now it’s the employers who made the nazi comparison, that’s progress. Maybe at some point we’ll get you to admit you made a dumb comparison.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago
      1. That’s a different person, genius

      2. Nobody compared anything, for the love of god

      “I support companies having this right because if they didn’t I’d be forced to work with Nazis more often” is a very straightforward concept

      • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        A straightforward concept and also a wrong one. Not firing people for one thing doesn’t mean not firing people for any other thing including being a fucking Nazi.

          • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I’m saying we shouldn’t. Are you saying that teacher is any of those people? There shouldn’t be a blank rule that people and corporations can exploit to do whatever the fuck they want.

              • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                You can’t discriminate against minority groups (and just to give examples but not a comprehensive list) like black people, gay people, and you can’t discriminate against people based only on them being a different religion. Look up protected classes.

                You need to look up protected classes as well, they’re broader than you seem to think. It’s just as illegal to discriminate against people white people, straight people, men, etc. Because protected classes cover discrimination based on race, sex, etc without specifying which sexes, races, etc are protected because all of them are.

              • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Do I want the entity whose reason for existing is to decide which behaviors are acceptable and infringe people’s rights to decide which behaviors are acceptable? Would be nice, but I like your suggestion where I get to choose. Either of those is better than a black check for a person or corporation to fire you for whatever reason they decide is against their “values”