Redditors Vent and Complain When People Mock Their "AI Art" - eviltoast

Setting aside the usual arguments on the anti- and pro-AI art debate and the nature of creativity itself, perhaps the negative reaction that the Redditor encountered is part of a sea change in opinion among many people that think corporate AI platforms are exploitive and extractive in nature because their datasets rely on copyrighted material without the original artists’ permission. And that’s without getting into AI’s negative drag on the environment.

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    AI art is, by very definition, average.

    It’s the best fit line. It’s the most common. The mean or the median.

    The best art is exceptional.

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Wow this really succinctly describes what I feel whenever I see AI art. It’s just an overwhelming feeling of indifference.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      8 months ago

      Average AI art is average. Exceptional AI art is exceptional.

      People who use AI as the tool it is, rather than just feeding it a single prompt and taking a few good results, can make art just like any other artist using a tool. Some of that art is exceptional. Most of it is average. Just like any other tool.

      The best AI art is often the result of multiple passes with inpainting and refining, and touchups in other tools. But that takes time, effort, and skill. Just like any other tool.

      • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        8 months ago

        LMFAO “uhm ackshually guys AI art takes skill just like human art”

        yeah bud, spending 30 minutes typing sentences into the artist crushing machine is grueling work

        • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Art is subjective. What I find impactful or meaningful may not be what you find impactful or meaningful. I’ll just say I’ve seen exceptional AI art, but it’s rare.

          I can’t remember the specifics, but I do recall there was a work that won some art contest and then had its win revoked because AI generation was used in its creation. I recall really liking that piece.

          Edit: I find it remarkable that anyone would downvote what I said in this post. The other I get, you all have your notions and aren’t going to change your minds, that’s fine, I get it. But nothing I said in this post was controversial.

      • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        8 months ago

        I fully agree with you. However, there’s no point bringing it up here in this echo chamber of luddites. They’re deathly afraid of ai (for no real reason), and it really shows.

        • adam_y@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m not afraid of AI and I’m certainly not a luddite my friend. I used to lecture about technology in art on several university courses.

          I’ve used algorithms to generate work that has been shown on an international stage, and used computers to run massive participatory art shows.

          I currently work in publishing, and I can’t express how much AI has already impacted the landscape through generative text. It doesn’t compete with traditional authors, it just smothers them through sheer volume. It clogs up submission processes and it fills open calls… And nearly every one using generative methods thinks they should be called an “author” just because they put a few words into a prompt.

          There really is a reason I hold this point if view and it is based on experience and education as well as being part of an industry that this is already having an impact on.

          If you want me to take you seriously, I’m going to need some real discussion around the firm that goes beyond name calling and vague statements.

          • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            8 months ago

            I honestly don’t give a fuck whether you take me seriously or not. As a luddite and technophobe, your opinion means less than nothing to me.

            Doesn’t change the fact that you’re afraid of AI though. It is gonna change things, and just because you’re afraid of it isn’t going to stop it. I suggest you learn to adapt.

        • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          Nah this is just an epidemic of lazy people who want the credit of being called an artist without putting in any of the work.

          • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            Nah its an epidemic of cowards who are afraid of things they don’t understand. Here’s some advice. Educate yourself, and maybe try to understand things before making stupid statements.