Starfield's lead quest designer had 'absolutely no time' and had to hit the 'panic button' so the game would have a satisfying final quest - eviltoast
  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    In the few years I’ve been making games for shits and giggles, the best rule I’ve developed is Always Be Shipping. You can tweak like crazy in the last hours of a project. You can build whole concepts only to throw them out. So long as you have A Game to push out the door, day-of, you are free to do whatever the hell you want.

    Doing your first level first or your last level last is absolute rookie shit.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t quite understand what you’re saying. Could you elaborate what you mean with “Doing your first level first or your last level last is absolute rookie shit.”?

      • teegus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 months ago

        They are saying: do the most important bits first, so that if you run out of time, you still have the important parts in place.

        • gerryflap@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          This also goes for many things in general, not just gamedev. I used to be a teaching assistant at the University that I was studying at, and this was the main thing people seemed to get wrong in their projects. Instead of going for the basics and building from there, they just went for all the fancy cool features, or the most optimal algorithm. Then, when the deadline inevitably came around, they would have basically nothing working correctly. Sometimes I even warned them, and yet it still went wrong.